![]() ![]() Pale Moon has changed its UI and also its code. ![]() You are desperate you lose your favorite toy soon! How was it this time? 0.35 market share gone again? You only want people not to leave Firefox which has a constantly shrinking market share. Mozilla does all for Chrome parity! So, i see more future in a browser like Vivaldi which may be Chromium based but adds features which oldskool Opera and Firefox once has possessed but which have been removed for Chrome parity and mobile device compatibility! For the ones who dislike closed source, Otter Browser would be the future alternative to switch over.Īnyway, as long as Pale Moon exists and until the point where no bugfixes or feature additions can be ported over because of total incompatibility, 5 stars from me!Īnd to the haters, if you hate Pale Moon, do not write here. If you want to criticize something, you can do that point! But what has that to do with Vivaldi?Īs Mozilla is hellbent on destroying Firefox for Desktop to make it 1:1 cross portable for mobile too, they remove more and more desktop related functions and hope that add-on devs bring back those features! That can not be denied, so if Moonchild falls out, the chance that someone takes over is small. Instead Pale Moon is a browser for us conservative guys which do not need bleeding edge web standardsīut what is indeed a problem is, as Pale Moon has only one lead programmer, the project will have a shorter life span as compared with Vivaldi or Firefox. For example on Github the next chosen set of HTML5 forms have been selected to be ported over. Pale Moon is for sure no outdated browser or frozen in time one. What i do like of Pale Moon: The maker is fond of power users, and he has an ideology which is against closed source features like MSE which leads to DRM! But that are small problems which have no real impact. Pale Moon has indeed some trouble with webpages, Dropbox with standard uploader for example or missing MSE functions which enable only 720P video on Youtube. Bad move Mozilla, most people wanted an experience with geek features and no minimalistic experience like Chrome. Switched over to Pale Moon as Mozilla tried to make a Chrome similar experience. Pale Moon and Vivaldi are my preferred browsers. Why i am using Pale Moon? Because i do not agree with all above! But stop bashing Mozilla, without them, Seamonkey and Pale Moon would not be around, they have earned at least a little bit respect for that! Never forget that, this is not bad or wrong, it is if anything at all, debatable! But they still have a large number of people around, who love exactly the things they have done. Granted, Mozilla could have done a way better job, they took a risk which did not work out in the end. So, what do you guys expect Mozilla to do in the first place? Chrome is the market leader! And to stay competitive it is logically that Mozilla tries to emulate the Chrome behavior, while making sure the existing user base is not alienated as much as possible. If you take a look at Mozilla's feedback system, people complain often "make it like Chrome" or "please add a feature like Chrome"! It is simple, not complex, has an appealing design, unusual tab form and gets out of your way! Please guys keep in mind that Mozilla is in direct competition to the big one's! Customization features made Mozilla's reputation of slow, unstable and bloated! So, to gain market share, they had to try something new.Īnd so many people are loving Google Chrome because it offers exactly that. No Firefox hater here! Means i totally understand why Mozilla "must clone Chrome"! It aims to not waste computer resources and power on inefficient programs, while at the same time serving a wide range of systems that are currently in use around the world. Pale Moon is a middle road, cutting away support for ancient systems to achieve a significant speed and efficiency increase, but not trying to squeeze the last few percent more out of it by limiting the range of systems it will run on even more. Linux) with regards to programs being compiled specifically for the capabilities of the machine it is installed on, it became obviously clear that Windows users were at a disadvantage: Mozilla only releases windows executables with maximum compatibility in mind, meaning that Firefox is made to run on as many different systems as possible, sacrificing efficiency and speed in the process to be compatible with, by current standards, absolutely ancient hardware. Having seen the advantages on other systems (e.g. Pale Moon is the work of a single individual, using contributed Open Source code to create a full-featured, speed optimized version of the popular Firefox browser. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |